Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678
Results 71 to 74 of 74

Thread: ANTIFA Ramping UP ^^^^^^^^^^^

  1. #71
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    5,583

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by VoorTrekker View Post
    There used to be a rumor that the National Guards were training for gun confiscations. In my twenty years as an infantryman and at division headquarters, there was never even one day of that kind of training. But impressionable reactionary people were "getting ready" for the big round up. Thanks to Betarourke and Red Flag we now know how "they" planned to do it.

    But I'm still not off the hook according to the "patriot militias."
    My youngest is full-time Army, and not one man in his unit would go along with that order.

    How they would do it is like China did Tienanmen Square and are doing HK. Bring in troops that don't speak the local language, and let them fly.
    Μολὼν λαβέ (Molon labe), “Come and get them!”

    Nobody owes you anything. You're only entitled to what you worked for.

    "Freedom is the right of all sentient beings." - Optimus Prime

  2. #72
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    In a flood plaine in hurricane country
    Posts
    3,180

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lone Eagle View Post
    My youngest is full-time Army, and not one man in his unit would go along with that order.

    How they would do it is like China did Tienanmen Square and are doing HK. Bring in troops that don't speak the local language, and let them fly.
    For the U.S. to use foreign troops would be a bigger disaster than "they" would imagine. One time our drill weekend was to go to Camp Swift Texas and we went by convoy, through civilian territory. Several people thought we were foreign troops because of the Army's continual uniform changes and if we had been foreign troops we may have gotten shot! And one would never guess which type of citizens...hint hint--not 3%'ers, not "patriot militia" or even the other group.

    The "they" people will use federal law enforcement units and take select targets in diverse places which have no proximity to each target. Then a few weeks it's forgotten and then hit another series of targets nearby. Eg. a town in each county then next week two counties over, then two counties over from the second targets series...

    That and Red Flag proceedings. Keep a file on each and every red flag hit which is reported in the news. Soon the hits will no longer be reported, not even the ones which are unsuccessful...
    Approach with a calm resolve, attack with reckless indifference. Gladius Republicae!
    "...use Gold like it's gunpowder..."

  3. #73
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    under the sea
    Posts
    760

    Default

    We have had this discussion before. They will not use foreign troops. The Russians would not waste their best Paratroopers to drop in and play. Granted they would prevail for a time. They would ultimately loose.

    Yes those who would use force first would be those "people" who use force in the everyday to get what they want....Think about that for a few. The Police would not put up any resistance. I'm sure a few would try and die. Most who train at all for some thing of this sort will have a plan. They will not throw their life away so quickly....Example. Army in Fallujah the first round, if they took fire they called up a tank or apc with heavy weapon system to deal with said problem.....NCO's doing their job!!! Marines on the other hand had like a 40% higher casualties. Why? When they took fire they would not call up armor and keep their heads down. No, they charged the buildings.....

    Rangers hitting Panama Airport. They were there to deal with the Panamanian SF. The SF of Panama were very good professional troops. The Rangers jumped in ready to fight. They caught the PSF with only about 30% with weapons. Had the PSF ever made it to the armory and gotten fully outfitted not just rifles and pistols but mg and such. They U.S. would of had put way more guys into rubber baggies to ship home.
    But your talking about a professional troops with a plan of defense and the skill and training to do it. That is why we would have a problem with any troops who are armed and ready to fight. Major mental disadvantage not being mentally prepared for a kill or be killed fight.

    I'm not saying that a few folks might have the skill and training to due damage to these folks. We are back to it would have to be a limited basis without a large group of folks with a plan and proper leadership training and equipment....

  4. #74
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    In a flood plaine in hurricane country
    Posts
    3,180

    Default

    Finris, one word...Somali "immigrants." Why would Russia send troops to assist a gov't which is hostile to her and jeopardize good relations with the people of this country?
    Those troops would be from a certain major Asian country, Africa and possibly South America. They would have no problems with it because they would be coming to loot our homes and rape our women and children.

    Why would an invading army have a defense plan? Don't you mean an attack plan?
    Approach with a calm resolve, attack with reckless indifference. Gladius Republicae!
    "...use Gold like it's gunpowder..."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •