Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: Chuck Grassley expects Supreme Court resignation 'this summer

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Chuck Grassley expects Supreme Court resignation 'this summer

    'Chuck Grassley expects Supreme Court resignation 'this summer'


    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017...is-summer.html



    Mere days after Justice Neil Gorsuch was seated on the Supreme Court, restoring the panel to full strength, a top Senate Republican said the court could soon be down a member once again – in turn giving President Trump another big appointment.


    “I would expect a resignation this summer,” Sen. Chuck Grassley, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, told Iowa’s Muscatine Journal.

    Grassley, R-Iowa, said there was a "rumored" retirement in the offing, though he wouldn't disclose which justice was considering stepping down.

    Grassley’s comments echo those made in February by fellow Judiciary Committee member and former Supreme Court litigator Sen. Ted Cruz.

    “I think we’ll have another Supreme Court vacancy this summer,” said Cruz, R-Texas. “If that happens, as much as the left is crazy now, they will go full Armageddon meltdown.”

    ON DIVIDED BENCH, JUSTICE KENNEDY HOLDS COURT

    Grassley predicted any new Supreme Court nominee would come from the list of potential justices put forward by Trump before he won the election. Gorsuch also came from that list and, despite bipartisan testimonials in favor of his confirmation, Senate Democrats led a fierce resistance to his seating, ultimately forcing Republicans to change Senate precedent by enacting the so-called “nuclear option.”

    Because of that, a Supreme Court nominee would only need 51 votes to be approved to the high court. Republicans currently have 52 seats in the Senate, all but ensuring any GOP-favored nominee would sail through. Gorsuch heard his first arguments as a justice on Monday.

    While Justice Kennedy, 80, is oft rumored to be considering retirement, there are several justices whose advanced age could signal a coming retirement. Ruth Bader Ginsburg is 84 and Stephen Breyer is 78. If any in that trio were to retire and be replaced by a reliably conservative justice, the court would noticeably lurch rightward. Ginsburg and Breyer are largely considered to be among the court’s more liberal jurists, while Kennedy is known as a “swing vote.”
    Remember what Einstein said:
    “I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.”

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    N. Texas
    Posts
    6,271

    Default

    Kennedy is a swing Idiot!!
    "The First Gay President", L'dMAO!! "Peace can ONLY be achieved through SUPERIOR FIREPOWER, STOMPING LIBS and CARPETBOMBING"!!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Lake LBJ, Texas
    Posts
    6,538

    Default

    Yea, you just have to laugh at the last sentence. Kennedy a swing vote, my azz.

    I don't see any liberal voluntarily stepping down knowing that either a conservative, or god forbid a Constitutionalist be appointed.
    If I had a dollar for every time I thought about you, I'd think about you more often.


    I dream of a tomorrow where a chicken can cross the road without his motives being questioned.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Morgan County, Alabama
    Posts
    2,374

    Default

    Breyer. It's gonna be Breyer.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    4,197

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TommyGunn View Post
    Breyer. It's gonna be Breyer.
    yeah, either him or The Notorious RBG
    Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    4,824

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tdale View Post
    yeah, either him or The Notorious RBG
    You mean Darth Vader Ginsburg?
    Common sense is so uncommon nowadays it ought to be reclassified as a super power

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    2,965

    Default

    I've heard rumors about Kennedy. RBG is not doing so well these days. In Kennedy's case I would expect it to be voluntary. In RBG's case I don't expect her to retire until she is literally unable to show up for work... UNLESS she was pressured into it. Maybe by the other Justices... telling her to retire while she can still go out gracefully instead of embarrassing herself and besmirching her "image". Or maybe there are people behind the scenes who have unseen influence on what the Supremes do. Honestly that wouldn't surprise me one bit. If their arguments are not persuasive enough, I wouldn't doubt that they might resort to threats. Speaking of threats...

    I'll always believe that Scalia's vacant seat was not entirely due to natural causes if you get my drift... it's just too convenient that he expires in the final days of Obama's presidency. Not saying it was necessarily Obama, but that somebody somewhere in the machinery wanted him to get to make one last pick, and were able to make that happen. Could have even been international... heck who knows. It's occurred to me that it is possible he got a blood clot on his long air flight (had just been overseas) a few days before and that the activity on the ranch broke it loose and he died in his sleep from the embolism... but when I meditate on that, it doesn't feel "right".

    I'm still very troubled about simple majority votes on SC nominees. I'd like to see Supreme Court justices have approval from both sides of the aisle. The SC should not be a partisan body... it should decide according to principle, according to sound jurisprudence. Wait until the Blue side has control of the senate and the White House. You're going to start seeing an increasingly polarized Supreme Court, gyrating back and forth between two political poles in ever widening arcs, and end up reversing itself every time the majority on the bench trades hands. It's going to result in chaos for the Judicial branch and that affects all branches of the law.
    Last edited by bruss01; 04-20-2017 at 06:22 PM.
    In a crazy world, it's the crazy man who can get by - and it's about to get cray-cray up in here.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Sweet Tennessee
    Posts
    1,772

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bruss01 View Post

    I'll always believe that Scalia's vacant seat was not entirely due to natural causes if you get my drift... it's just too convenient that he expires in the final days of Obama's presidency. Not saying it was necessarily Obama, but that somebody somewhere in the machinery wanted him to get to make one last pick, and were able to make that happen. Could have even been international... heck who knows. It's occurred to me that it is possible he got a blood clot on his long air flight (had just been overseas) a few days before and that the activity on the ranch broke it loose and he died in his sleep from the embolism... .
    If that's the case their plan back fired. It would have been better for them to have taken out an older more liberal scj then they would have been replacing an Apple with an Apple (or a turd with a turd whatever) and the GOP wouldn't have fraught so hard...... no no wait, that doesn't make sense either because Hellary was supposed to take obummers place.......
    Don't bring skittles to a gun fight.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    2,965

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flock6 View Post
    If that's the case their plan back fired. It would have been better for them to have taken out an older more liberal scj then they would have been replacing an Apple with an Apple (or a turd with a turd whatever) and the GOP wouldn't have fraught so hard...... no no wait, that doesn't make sense either because Hellary was supposed to take obummers place.......
    It made sense at the time because they were 99% sure Hillary would win and the polls were backing them up. When that black swan reared its head it upset a lot of applecarts. It did indeed backfire.
    In a crazy world, it's the crazy man who can get by - and it's about to get cray-cray up in here.

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bruss01 View Post
    It made sense at the time because they were 99% sure Hillary would win and the polls were backing them up. When that black swan reared its head it upset a lot of applecarts. It did indeed backfire.
    They were counting on the mass media to convince the Trump supporters to stay home with their phony polls that were saying Hillary had a 98% chance of winning on the night before the election. We didn't give a crap what the polls said, and we exposed the media for what it truly is; mass propaganda. It was one of the greatest moments in US political history IMO.

    Communist News.jpg
    Last edited by Fontaine; 04-21-2017 at 12:22 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •